Other posts in this series:
- Independent students and the I-go You-go game (part 1: a class structure)
- Independent students and the I-go You-go game (part 2: I-go You-go)
- Independent students and the I-go You-go game (part 3: graduated challenges and application)
- Independent students and the I-go You-go game (part 4: Teaching ethos and goals)
How does this exercise scale up for more experienced students?
With the intermediate group after that one, we taught the same class structure:
1. the big apple was faster and harder (I led that one and fucked it up royally. PRACTICE!)
2. Then I-go, You-go with more complex rhythms.
3. Then social dancing lindy, with pauses to ask them to dance as though they’re still playing I-go, You-go.
4. Then we asked them to add on to their ‘basic’ rhythm with a stomp off on &8.
5. Then we worked on a rhythmic variation/shape thingy on 7812 of a swing out. This taught connection stuff, but also required them to stop thinking in 8 counts and start treating a dance like one long rhythm.
6. Then we taught a partnered solo jazz sequence we stole from Norma and Frankie. But they had to lead it and follow it. We looked at how close you stand to your partner, how you can lead a rhythm without touching someone (ie how to do I-go, You-go :D), how OGs used specific rhythmic sequences over and over again, so they developed a shared repertoire, etc. We were really STRICT about them all really dancing these rhythms. No mumbling their way through.
7. Then we asked them to mash all this stuff together.
This bit was wonderful: stomp off &8, clear basic rhythms (time steps), rhythmic variations that may or may not sync with your partner’s, and then these shared open position solo sequences.
Class goals (ie why we used I-go, You-go and the other exercises in this order):
This is my current bugbear: WHY do people stop dead on 3&4? On 8? For breaks? Why do they divide a dance into 8 count blocks?
We wanted to:
– Preserve historic sequences and steps;
– Get them to really partner dance in open position with jazz stuff;
– Use the call and response model to make their lindy hop more rhythmically precise;
– Really engage with the music as a long piece of rhythm, not lots of little 8 count segments.
I’m also really keen on leaders really thinking ahead and being very clear in what they’re about to lead, rhythmically. The leaders have to really LEAD. This is where I don’t really dig ambidancestrous stuff, because I think that leading and following are different roles. To really LEAD, a leader/caller needs to engage their muscles in a very specific way. It requires we engage our bodies and brains. We have to be really clear and precise. Which incidentally engages our cores and makes us easier to follow/lead. And that means making rhythmic sequences and shapes very clear and specific, and always being ready to do the next thing.
It was epic fun.
