feeling 3/5, .effort 3/5, duration 01:00
More humidity! Sweating like nobody’s business. But feeling quite fit and well, surprisingly.
Weather cloudy, hot
feeling 3/5, .effort 3/5, duration 01:00
More humidity! Sweating like nobody’s business. But feeling quite fit and well, surprisingly.
Weather cloudy, hot
feeling 3/5, effort 3/5, duration 01:30,
Started slow and boring but improved. Need a goal to keep me motivated at the moment.
Huuuuumid. Hooooot.
Weather: cloudy, hot
feeling: 3/5, duration 01:00, effort 3/5
Dancing on and off for an hour. Not at all hardcore, but very hot and humid.
Weather: cloudy, rainy, hot
feeling: alright, duration: 0:45, effort 1/5
2 hours reduced to 45minutes. I was too boring even for me to handle. Boring dancer is BORED.
Weather: cloudy rainy sunny
Currently 4/5 Effort.effort 4/5, feeling: great, duration: 5:00
Not 5 hours straight, but 5 hours over the evening. BEST couple of hours dancing at the late night.
Weather: cloudy, rain
duration: 5:00, feeling great, effort 4/5
Not 5 hours straight, but 5 hours over the evening. BEST couple of hours dancing at the late night.
Weather: cloudy, rain
duration: 5:00, feeling great, effort 4/5
Definitely not 5 hours straight! Lots of social dancing over the evening, from about 9.30pm. Still feeling good.
Weather: cloudy, rain
feeling: great, duration: 04:00
4 hours of dancing, off and on (definitely not 4 hours straight). Felt good!
about 1 month ago
Weather: cloudy, rain
duration: 1.30, feeling; good
Not at my most inspired. Did some solid work, and a little hi-impact stuff, but I need inspiration. Also, learning new routines is a slow, low-impact process and I’d kind of a like a little more adrenaline…
I am full of hayfever and premenstrual rage. I am, of course, excellent company. The Squeeze is in the garage with his earplugs in, podcasts a-blasting as he rebuilds his bike.
Thinking more about music I might play for the Gangbusters set.
Brief: > 180bpm, high energy music that gets people dancing like crazy fools.
Classic big band swing rock stars
These guys are the top ten, Christina Aguileras of the swing era. It sounds a bit same, but that’s because you’re listening to the popular music of one very specific period, music whose primary purpose was dancing. The large bands are firmly managed by serious, competent (and often quite gifted) arrangements. The musicians are highly skilled, and the bands themselves were playing to live audiences, on the radio and in recordings every week, travelling all the time. These are professional musicians with serious skills. Solos are usually pre-planned, if not scored ahead of time.
Musicians are grouped by section (eg ‘brass’, ‘rhythm’, etc) and you often get a number of people playing the same instrument – a couple of trumpeters, a couple of clarinetists. This grouping and concentration of instrumentation allows the bands to bring a solid wall of sound. I like this stuff as a dancer because there are layers of sound – different parts, multiple parts to the melody happening at any one time. Beyond notes, there are layers of rhythms which can be very simple (the chunk chunk chunk of a walking bass line) or very complex (the brass, rhythm section and woodwinds all playing contrasting and complementary rhythms as well as notes). Solos are often contrasted against a ‘background’ of supporting instruments. There’s lots to hear, and lots to work with in my body.
Smaller groups of the same period
These are smaller groups, usually made up of smaller sections of a big band, of a group of like-minded musicians or of groups put together for promotional or creative purposes. The arrangements are sweet, but there’re usually more opportunities for improvisation. Each instrument is showcased in a way large bands don’t allow. There aren’t the same walls of sound or complex layers of melody and rhythm. Bands like Benny Goodman’s small groups often had quite sophisticated, complicated relationships between the instruments, but in his case in particular, they were also quite delicate rather than ear-shaking thumpers. I’m very fond of Ellington’s small groups for the way they show cased particular instrumentalists and matched chunky rhythms with interesting melodies and musicianship. I like the Chicago boys of the late 20s for their raucous exuberance. People like Joe Venuti and Django Reinhardt add a more string-driven sound that feels a little less chunky and a little more visually interesting. I’m also fond of bands like the blokes from Glenn Miller’s band working in France after his death, or Roy Eldridge’s smaller groups.
There are lots of smaller bands from this same 30s-40s period, and I tend to think of them as complements to larger projects (like Ellington’s smaller groups or Basie’s work with Benny Goodman’s small bands). There are also New Orleans revivalist projects, or, to put it another way, smaller or medium sized bands featuring New Orleans stars, but doing a more swinging version of New Orleans style hot jazz. Sidney Bechet, Louis Armstrong, Kid Ory – all these guys were involved in projects like these. Sidney Bechet’s groups in this vein are massively popular with lindy hoppers, though they’re not quite the super-hot stuff they were five years ago. And then there are vocal groups and groups with a humorous or novelty twist. Slim and Slam. Cats and the Fiddle. Stuff Smith’s groups. Fats Waller. Teddy Wilson. And so on.
Working with all this stuff, I’ve certainly got plenty to get me through the set. But there are lots of less well-known musicians and groups to add. Western swing doods like Bob Wills. British acts like Danny Polo. The Harlem Hamfats (who have gotten quite popular lately, but who I’m not entirely sure are top shelf acts). European bands like the Harlem Kiddies and Leo Mathisen’s various bands. Smaller combos or bands led or fronted by vocalists like Una Mae Carlisle or Maxine Sullivan. Willie the Lion Smith’s bits and pieces.
…and so on and so on…
There’s so much to work with even before I get to contemporary bands. And I tend to feel there just aren’t modern bands who were as good as some of these bands when they were at the best. There are the odd contemporary bands who are really, really good. But the social and lifestyle factors which produced the musicians of the swing era just don’t exist today.
I know this makes me a bit of a boring old stick, but I guess I am quite conservative. But that doesn’t mean I will ignore or not play contemporary bands that are good. My sets are loaded with new bands. Loaded.
Who are my go-to guys for this set, then?